|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Jul 18, 2018 3:29:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by shewrites2 on Jul 20, 2018 19:21:21 GMT
I used them once, 2 years ago, and will NEVER, EVER use them again. Shady, rude to customers... Just bad.
|
|
|
Post by davidvandyke on Jul 22, 2018 23:48:52 GMT
I used them once, 2 years ago, and will NEVER, EVER use them again. Shady, rude to customers... Just bad. Ditto. I actually don't think they use any (or many) shady tactics. My also-boughts were fine when I used to use them, and I got decent results. But the guy who runs it is rude and arbitrary, and doesn't like being questioned. When you run a business, it's fair for customers and clients to question you closely to be sure of how things work, who they're doing business with, and so on.
|
|
|
Post by Percival Constantine on Jul 23, 2018 22:58:16 GMT
I've never used them, but the guy who runs the site is one of the rudest people I've ever seen on KBoards, and that's saying something. Plus, any service that guarantees a certain number of downloads/sales is very suspect and suggests they're doing something they shouldn't be.
|
|
|
Post by davidvandyke on Jul 24, 2018 22:40:52 GMT
I've never used them, but the guy who runs the site is one of the rudest people I've ever seen on KBoards, and that's saying something. Plus, any service that guarantees a certain number of downloads/sales is very suspect and suggests they're doing something they shouldn't be. To me, the fact that he doesn't always deliver shows me he is actually less shady than some. If he were completely shady, he'd never fail to deliver. What i do believe on the evidence is that he's a penny-pincher who wants to make the guarantee, but doesn't want to happily refund even a pro-rated amount. His penny-pinching is also evident in that the sites and pages where he gets people to buy or download books are all run by him and are hard to find and connect to BButterfly. There's a lack of transparency there--although again, to be fair, he's pointed at some of the sites himself when questioned on KBoards. My professional evaluation of his business style is that it's sub-optimal, and I can do without the headaches for the potential for a few sales.
|
|
drake
New Member
Posts: 7
|
Post by drake on Jul 26, 2018 20:01:57 GMT
Books Butterfly should be avoided. They're not going to send you fake traffic or anything like that, more like you'll get no traffic at all. The problem is that it's one of the more expensive promo sites around, and they GUARANTEE certain results which they can't really deliver on a regular basis. The owner is also pretty abrasive and has no problem fighting with customers even in public. Your money can be better spent elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by polydactylcat on Jul 29, 2018 5:25:11 GMT
To me, the fact that he doesn't always deliver shows me he is actually less shady than some. If he were completely shady, he'd never fail to deliver. What i do believe on the evidence is that he's a penny-pincher who wants to make the guarantee, but doesn't want to happily refund even a pro-rated amount. His penny-pinching is also evident in that the sites and pages where he gets people to buy or download books are all run by him and are hard to find and connect to BButterfly. There's a lack of transparency there--although again, to be fair, he's pointed at some of the sites himself when questioned on KBoards. My professional evaluation of his business style is that it's sub-optimal, and I can do without the headaches for the potential for a few sales. The sites he's linked to were really horribly designed, at least the time I looked at them. I honestly can't imagine they get much traffic, they're so unprofessional. And I'm just waiting for him to show up here to defend himself and explain to us all why we're wrong and will never succeed.
|
|
|
Post by writeway on Aug 23, 2018 4:47:52 GMT
Never used them. Saw on Kboards that they are a scam as well as that owner is ridiculous. Some know-it-all with a pompous attitude. Has the nerve to complain about authors bringing issues to the public yet BB never seems to answer complaints when you email them I hear. I wouldn't go with anything that guarantees anything especially if you are in KU. Sites like these might be relying on bots to click books and you can end up in more trouble than it's worth.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2018 17:32:25 GMT
Never used them. Saw on Kboards that they are a scam as well as that owner is ridiculous. Some know-it-all with a pompous attitude. Has the nerve to complain about authors bringing issues to the public yet BB never seems to answer complaints when you email them I hear. I wouldn't go with anything that guarantees anything especially if you are in KU. Sites like these might be relying on bots to click books and you can end up in more trouble than it's worth. The owner is not a scammer and he doesn't use bots as far as anyone knows. Full stop. There has been absolutely no evidence of either of those things and I don't think anyone has who has used them ever brought up scamming as an issue. Initially, it was great. It had the readers and the open and click rates to deliver on its guarantees (which really weren't huge guarantees). And then the market got over-saturated and the clicks didn't happen. So he transferred the guarantee to a credit approach, but it still came down to the same thing. The service didn't adapt or grow as the landscape of the market changed and the service just doesn't deliver the clicks or opens we've come to expect from larger services. The two criticisms of this service have always only been that it doesn't deliver and the owner is an asshole. No where has anyone ever offered any credible information that the owner uses bots. The biggest complaint is that he doesn't tell you what the front-end is, so you can't subscribe to the newsletter. And I actually understand that at its height, it wanted the author backend separate from the reader frontend. Unfortunately in the current environment, that separation makes it easy for people to make what ultimate are unsubstantiated accusations.
|
|
|
Post by davidvandyke on Aug 23, 2018 18:26:10 GMT
I second what Nomen says above. There's no evidence of a scam, unless you call being difficult about getting your refund and unclear about how the terms are applied a scam--and I don't. I just chalk that up to the owner being a jerk and don't use his service anymore. The guy has a lot of knowledge, but he's a blowhard who oversells his ability to deliver, then gets pissed when questioned or when it appears he hasn't delivered.
For a while he was in a unique position and had appeared to break new ground with his guarantees and results--but he fumbled the ball, didn't improve, became less transparent instead of more, and generally missed an opportunity to become a big player by constantly pissing his customers off.
So, caveat emptor. Not a scam, but be warned.
|
|
|
Post by Anarchist on Sept 15, 2018 12:30:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Sept 15, 2018 18:44:59 GMT
Thanks for the heads up Anarchist! That thread is hilarious. I loved your laughing gif. To summarize for those who don't want to visit Kboards or in case the thread gets nuked. A rep from Books Butterfly sent out a string of threatening emails to a guy who runs a small site with a reviews section, demanding that all of the negative Books Butterfly reviews be taken down and the contact deets of those reviewers be handed over. The site owner said "absolutely not" to handing over the contact deets, Books Butterfly Rep gets very upset, makes more threats. Site owner removes review section. Books Butterfly rep still not satisfied, sends a threatening email to one of the peeps who had left one of the offending reviews. Also, here are a couple links that explain that leaving negative reviews is perfectly legal. Reviews can sometimes enter into libel or slander, but the bar is pretty high. As long as you stick to facts and your personal feelings and experience (stating that these are your feelings and experience) you should be fine if you ever do get sued. But most of the time you won't. I haven't heard of Books Butterfly actually suing anyone yet, so far, they appear to be all bark, no bite. nbcnews.com/business/consumer/yes-you-can-post-negative-online-review-says-congress-n693001 practice.findlaw.com/practice-guide/online-reviews-and-defamation.html I'm leaving out the http code so that the viglink won't take over and hopefully those who have trouble with links can just copy/google and find them easier.
|
|
|
Post by Anarchist on Sept 15, 2018 19:03:07 GMT
If anyone cares to see the original threatening emails sent from Books Butterfly to James (the OP at Kboards), do the following:
Search Google for site:kboards.com books butterfly is threatening
On the first listing, click the small arrow positioned to the right of the URL.
Select "Cached"
Keep in mind that Google caches KB frequently, so those images will be gone soon.
|
|
DD
Full Member
Posts: 180
|
Post by DD on Sept 16, 2018 0:52:31 GMT
I would never use them, because of the way the owner treats authors who are unhappy with the service (honestly, some of his rants are appalling) and because the refund isn't money back, but another promo. I mean, seriously? If the service was a bust the first time, why would more of it be acceptable compensation?
|
|
|
Post by eleutheria on Sept 16, 2018 2:41:11 GMT
That guy is a total loon. And very angry that people won't take him seriously. Given the rep, I doubt the site makes enough money to pay for lawyer on top of other expenses. I think it's been pointed out in the Kboards thread that there hasn't actually even been a cease and desist, just threats. He just threatened the new owners, too. I don't know if they'll fall for it, but even if they do, Books Butterfly is insane if they think that will actually stop authors from telling each other about this. Or ... posting it on here!
|
|
|
Post by paranormalkitty on Sept 16, 2018 5:40:22 GMT
I've just finished reading that thread. He is really going off the rails...wow.
|
|
|
Post by polydactylcat on Sept 16, 2018 6:53:16 GMT
If anyone cares to see the original threatening emails sent from Books Butterfly to James (the OP at Kboards), do the following: Search Google for site:kboards.com books butterfly is threatening On the first listing, click the small arrow positioned to the right of the URL. Select "Cached" Keep in mind that Google caches KB frequently, so those images will be gone soon. Thanks, Anarchist . The level of crazy in those screenshots is epic. Also, I think if they need to hire " a full time defamation lawyer as our Legal Counsel", that says a lot about their business right there!
|
|
|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Sept 16, 2018 7:39:51 GMT
And the playroom has been locked for the night so that the little girls and boys don't accidentally fall and hurt themselves while no one's watching. Awwwwe
|
|
|
Post by writeone on Sept 16, 2018 16:15:52 GMT
I didn't have the opportunity to post until the thread was locked.
It's just my opinion, but everyone involved at Books Butterfly should be embarrassed. I was so appalled by their posts, that I shared the thread to every Facebook writers' group I belong to. Their words speak for themselves.
As for the thread being locked on kboards, I can't say I'm surprised.
As for all that suing nonsense the BBF rep was spewing, there is a reason Canadians aren't litigious. Losers pay all fees (lawyers, etc) for both sides.
A short story I'll share that happened years ago in a neighbouring Canadian province. A family won the lottery. A few million was involved, but the aunt was shutting out her nephew (could have been mother/son - too long ago for me to remember). The court case went on for a while and in the end the aunt won the case and the nephew had to pay all her court costs.
In my opinion, BBF has no lawyer and has no intentions of suing. EVER.
|
|
DD
Full Member
Posts: 180
|
Post by DD on Sept 16, 2018 20:08:02 GMT
What are the odds someone too cheap to refund customers their money after he's guaranteed results would spring $$$$ to have a lawyer on retainer?
|
|
|
Post by davidvandyke on Sept 16, 2018 21:33:28 GMT
That's why the OP should never have caved.
I mean, I understand why he did--people usually try to avoid trouble--but any time one caves to threats, especially empty threats, it emboldens that person to keep bullying.
|
|
|
Post by writeone on Sept 16, 2018 21:34:02 GMT
What are the odds someone too cheap to refund customers their money after he's guaranteed results would spring $$$$ to have a lawyer on retainer? No chance. And no one should be afraid of them, in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Anarchist on Sept 16, 2018 22:57:15 GMT
People who are serious about filing a suit don't usually approach the party they intend to sue to threaten legal action. It's intimidation. Nothing more. If you're the party being threatened, I recommend taking these steps: Step 1. Maintain your poker face. Step 2. Keep all emails, record all calls, note all conversations. Step 3. Provide your lawyer's contact details. No other response is necessary. If harassment continues, inform the other party to kindly go fuck himself. Otherwise...
|
|
|
Post by polydactylcat on Sept 17, 2018 0:57:39 GMT
And it appears the thread is going to stay locked. Though, to be completely honest, after pages and pages of the BBF rep feeling the need to respond to every single poster, and the insistence that sometimes there is no choice but to be unprofessional (da fuq?), I'd say that there really isn't anything more that needs to be said. Anyone who's still willing to do business with BBF after that trainwreck can't be helped.
|
|
|
Post by davidvandyke on Sept 17, 2018 18:40:09 GMT
Call it the Business Darwin Awards, or "How to shoot yourself in the foot."
|
|
|
Post by writeone on Sept 22, 2018 14:24:46 GMT
I hope the Books Butterfly people do not find their way here.
|
|
DD
Full Member
Posts: 180
|
Post by DD on Sept 22, 2018 15:16:58 GMT
Yeah, I was wondering about that yesterday. Maybe this section should be in the members-only area so it doesn't show up in a google search. Something tells me there are some people who might obsessively hunt for negative reviews about themselves.
|
|
|
Post by davidvandyke on Sept 22, 2018 16:24:42 GMT
It doesn't take hunting--Google Alerts or Mention will bring it to their attention.
But, there's nothing that says we have to allow the guy to rant here. He's not an indie author, not even an author, and I don't see we have any obligation to engage with services that the community thinks are shady or problematic. I mean, we wouldn't allow the known bad vanity publishers like Author Solutions to come here to try to defend themselves, or perhaps more apropos, we wouldn't allow G-crave or Warrior Forum people to pitch or defend themselves--they've already been convicted, so to speak, by plenty of evidence. Free speech is great, but it always has to be defended against the equivalent of falsely yelling fire in the cinema.
|
|
|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Sept 22, 2018 17:12:09 GMT
We're small enough now that I'm not too worried about it. I don't think we're quite getting page one in google yet, unless someone specifically types in "Indie Author Haven."
But for when the time does come we could always have a rule saying that anyone who is a known scammer/has a very low reputation in the industry is not allowed to post here. I wouldn't want to hide this section because we want the newbie lurkers to be able to read it before they make a bad business decision.
|
|
DD
Full Member
Posts: 180
|
Post by DD on Sept 24, 2018 0:06:52 GMT
We're small enough now that I'm not too worried about it. I don't think we're quite getting page one in google yet, unless someone specifically types in "Indie Author Haven." But for when the time does come we could always have a rule saying that anyone who is a known scammer/has a very low reputation in the industry is not allowed to post here. I wouldn't want to hide this section because we want the newbie lurkers to be able to read it before they make a bad business decision. True, and that's the biggest drawback of a lot of forums; all the really useful information is hidden behind members-only links. Every solution has pros and cons I suppose.
|
|