|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Sept 21, 2018 19:14:08 GMT
I have tried to compile as complete a list as I could. If I missed anything, reply and I'll add it in. Also, please do comment with your experiences with each of the companies listed. Let me know if I got anything wrong or included something in the wrong section. I have only used KDP and D2D, myself, so don't think something you see listed here is an endorsement or recommendation. I added many companies that you should probably never ever use. I did so because I want everyone to be aware of which places are safe and good, and which places are safe but meh, and which places are unsafe and horrid. I know kboards had a pretty good thread going, but I'd like to start a new one here which we can hopefully keep updated. Publish Direct Sign up to publish with Kindle Direct Publishing - kdp.amazon.com KDP Current User Agreement - kdp.amazon.com/en_US/terms-and-conditions Where you can read KDP's current written rules - kdp.amazon.com/en_US/help/topic/G200627430 Contact info for amazon when there is a problem jeff@amazon.com ecr-support@amazon.com kdp-support@amazon.com title-submission@amazon.comSign up with Google Play - play.google.com/books/publish/Google Play's Terms of Service - play.google.com/about/play-terms.htmlTo learn more about them - play.google.com/about/developer-distribution-agreement.html Sign up to publish with Barnes & Noble Press - press.barnesandnoble.com/Barnes and Nobles TOS - www.barnesandnoble.com/h/nook-store-terms-of-serviceFind out how it works - press.barnesandnoble.com/how-it-worksSign up with Kobo Writing Life - www.kobo.com/us/en/p/writinglifeKobo Terms of Use - www.kobo.com/termsofuse Sign up with Apple ibooks (you need a Mac to work with them) - support.apple.com/en-us/HT201183 Ibooks Support - support.apple.com/kb/ph2808 Publish your RPG content with Drive Thru Fiction - www.drivethrurpg.com/join.php Direct Erotica PublishersSign up with Excitica - www.excitica.com/index.php/umicrosite/vendor/register/Excitica TOS - www.excitica.com/excitica-seller-terms-and-conditionsSign up to publish with Lot's Cave - www.lotscave.com/publish/manuscripts-wanted.phpThe closest thing to a TOS I could find - lotscave.wordpress.com/writers-wanted/Aggregators Sign up with Draft2Digital.com - www.draft2digital.com/D2D's Current TOS - www.draft2digital.com/terms-of-service/ To learn more about them - www.draft2digital.com/faq www.draft2digital.com/knowledge-base/ Sign up with Smashwords.com - www.smashwords.com Smashwords Current TOS - www.smashwords.com/about/tosTo learn more about them - www.smashwords.com/about/supportfaq Sign up with PublishDrive - publishdrive.com/ PDF of Publish Drive's TOS - admin.publishdrive.com/bin/pdf/Publishdrive_Terms_and_conditions_2.0.pdf To learn more about them - publishdrive.com/faq/ Sign up with Streetlib - www.streetlib.com/publish/ Distribution Agreement - www.streetlib.com/da_v1/ FAQ - www.streetlib.com/faq-book-publishing/ Sign up with Boruma - www.borumapublishing.com/index.htm Terms of Service - www.borumapublishing.com/terms-of-service-general.htm Sign up with Publit - www.publit.com/en/ TOS - publit.io/tos Books Mango - booksmango.com/ TOS - booksmango.com/terms-of-service Xinxii - www.xinxii.com/ TOS - www.xinxii.com/gd_cms.php/en?page=tou_en ebooks2go - www.ebooks2go.net/ Distribution - www.ebooks2go.net/ebook-distribution-services Print Publishing KDP Print - kdp.amazon.com Publish with Ingram Spark - www.ingramspark.com/ Prices - www.ingramspark.com/features TOS - www.ingramspark.com/terms-of-use www.ingramspark.com/blog/ingramspark-vs-createspace (old article title createspace should have been updated to say KDP Print) Blurb Publishing - www.blurb.com/self-publish TOS - www.blurb.com/terms Books-A-Million Retail Stores
Public Your Books with BAM! - www.booksamillion.com/publishers/index.html?id=7385062834643 How to Apply - www.booksamillion.com/publishers/books.html?id=7385062834643#submittitle You have to apply to the distributor that makes all of the purchasing decisions for BAM, so you fill out a form and send them a free print copy, and then they decide if they want to carry it or not. If they decide not to buy it, they donate it to charity for soldiers. Publishing Peddlers AKA Vanity Presses to Avoid like the Plague Book Baby - www.bookbaby.com/ (Vanity is likely, let me know if you know different.) TOS - www.bookbaby.com/terms-of-service Sign up with Lulu - www.lulu.com Lulu Legal - www.lulu.com/about/legal www.kboards.com/index.php?topic=238020.0 davidgaughran.com/2016/01/07/fyi-penguin-random-house-is-still-in-the-vanity-business/ I believe Lulu is a Vanity Press, or at least certain portions of it are, so I would not use them. I've included them only for completeness and warning. If you have used them and had a good experience, then please reply and let us know. Fast Pencil - www.fastpencil.com/ (probaby a vanity, but I'm not sure. Reply, if I'm wrong, or you know more about it. ) Authorhouse - www.authorhouse.com/ (definitely a vanity publisher, stay far away unless you want to be bled dry for puny, if any results) Notion Press - notionpress.com/ (Vanity) X-libris - www.xlibris.com/ (Vanity) iuniverse - www.iuniverse.com/ (Vanity) Outskirts Press - outskirtspress.com/ (Vanity) dogear publishing - www.dogearpublishing.net/ (Vanity) Westbow Press - www.westbowpress.com (Vanity) Austin Mcauley - www.austinmacauley.com izzardink.com/ Don't Use Vanity Publishers. Stay far, far away from them! davidgaughran.com/tag/vanity-publishing/ davidgaughran.com/basics/ tragicbooks.com/2017/01/02/my-experience-self-publishing-with-createspace-blurb-kindle-lulu-smashwords-and-peecho/ jerichowriters.com/austin-macauley/
|
|
|
Post by davidvandyke on Sept 21, 2018 23:52:34 GMT
xlibris is a vanity publisher, probably need a note there.
|
|
|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Sept 22, 2018 0:06:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by davidvandyke on Sept 22, 2018 16:36:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Sept 22, 2018 16:46:11 GMT
Thanks, I added them in!
|
|
|
Post by writeway on Sept 24, 2018 3:06:12 GMT
I will state my opinions of each thing and my opinion of the process of working with them.
I am wide by the way and I am direct with KDP, Google Play, Kobo, and Barnes and Noble.
KDP:
I have come to loathe Amazon as an author. They have sickened me so in the last few years with how they've treated authors, etc. The scammer thing is what really did it for me and how they didn't give a damn about how this hurt authors until the media got involved. Still, of course I have to sell there but if I had a choice I wouldn't sell on Amazon at all. Thank god I am wide. I couldn't handle being exclusive to Amazon with the crap they pull!
Process of Publishing on KDP:
Like second nature. The only thing is sometimes I have an issue with my file being mucked up in the preview and I might have to change it multiple times but other than that it's usually easy to put a book on Amazon.
Google Play:
Become one of my favorites! My income has gone up there the last three months. I believe it's the permafrees. Freebies really help you get things going on Google Play. The site needs a serious overhaul though. You can't search books like you do on other sites. You gotta put in the name of any book you want and they don't update the books they have listed on the genre pages. The site is very boring and they have no ranking system, nothing. So the only way you can tell how your book is doing is by looking at your sales figures.
Process of Google Play:
Many authors hate it but it doesn't bother me. Once you know your prices then it's easy. Sometimes I have a file that's rejected but the most I've had to upload something is twice. You are supposed upload PDFs to Google Play but many don't seem to know that. I do wish they had a way you could check sales without downloading. The easy way to see how you are doing is just check the amount of money you have in the Paid section so you don't have to download that excel sheet. Also, wish they had a place to put keywords. All you can do is place them at the bottom of your book description but I doubt keywords even work on GP.
Barnes and Noble:
When I first started wide I was making more here than any other retailer outside Amazon. I'm still doing okay but Google Play and Apple is surpassing my income at Barnes and Noble. Their site can use an overhaul as well. It's boring and they have NO series page which makes me wonder why they make you mention if your book is part of a series if there is no series page anyway??? You have to put keywords in your title field or else your book most likely won't be found by readers.
Process of Publishing on Barnes and Noble:
Meh. Guess it's easy enough but it takes them a while to convert your cover and interior files and they've changed how you pick categories and made it more complicated to me but it's okay.
Kobo:
The worst retailer for me. I barely move anything at Kobo and my only hope selling much there is Walmart. I am at the point where I am not sure I will continue to put books on this retailer.
Process of Publishing on Kobo:
Extremely easy. Probably the easiest out of all the retailers but be very careful with pre-orders. If you update a pre-order file make sure you remember to re-do the date or else your book will publish THAT day. That's one thing I don't like. Kobo should have the pre-order date set and it shouldn't change whether you redo your file or not.
Apple:
No Mac so I go through D2D. Apple is okay and my sales are doing better there as time goes on.
Process of Publishing on Apple:
D2D makes it easy enough but I wish I could do it direct. I don't like how D2D doesn't allow you to put hyphens in your name and claim it's Apple who doesn't allow it but I see authors who are direct with Apple with hyphens in their name so it's clearly not Apple. I wish there were better categories and keywords to choose from. I don't like how they don't really have a set category for one of the genres I write but from what I hear this is a D2D issue not Apple. Other than that, easy and straightforward to upload there.
Draft 2 Digital:
Best aggregator out there in my opinion. Hands down.
Smashwords:
Sucks on every level and the website still looks like something out of 1998. Mark needs to get rid of that Meatgrinder. No one likes it but him! It should not be that much of a hassle to upload books on a site. I have stopped putting books on there. Not worth the time.
Streetlib:
Emails you every darn day and I doubt I've sold anything. I only have a few books on there for global markets. I don't plan on putting more up there.
PublishDrive:
Guess it's okay. I only have a few books there and use them for Global markets.
|
|
|
Post by Jeff Tanyard on Sept 24, 2018 23:39:44 GMT
I will state my opinions of each thing and my opinion of the process of working with them. I am wide by the way and I am direct with KDP, Google Play, Kobo, and Barnes and Noble. KDP:I have come to loathe Amazon as an author. They have sickened me so in the last few years with how they've treated authors, etc. The scammer thing is what really did it for me and how they didn't give a damn about how this hurt authors until the media got involved. Still, of course I have to sell there but if I had a choice I wouldn't sell on Amazon at all. Thank god I am wide. I couldn't handle being exclusive to Amazon with the crap they pull! Process of Publishing on KDP:Like second nature. The only thing is sometimes I have an issue with my file being mucked up in the preview and I might have to change it multiple times but other than that it's usually easy to put a book on Amazon. Google Play:Become one of my favorites! My income has gone up there the last three months. I believe it's the permafrees. Freebies really help you get things going on Google Play. The site needs a serious overhaul though. You can't search books like you do on other sites. You gotta put in the name of any book you want and they don't update the books they have listed on the genre pages. The site is very boring and they have no ranking system, nothing. So the only way you can tell how your book is doing is by looking at your sales figures. Process of Google Play:
Many authors hate it but it doesn't bother me. Once you know your prices then it's easy. Sometimes I have a file that's rejected but the most I've had to upload something is twice. You are supposed upload PDFs to Google Play but many don't seem to know that. I do wish they had a way you could check sales without downloading. The easy way to see how you are doing is just check the amount of money you have in the Paid section so you don't have to download that excel sheet. Also, wish they had a place to put keywords. All you can do is place them at the bottom of your book description but I doubt keywords even work on GP. Barnes and Noble:When I first started wide I was making more here than any other retailer outside Amazon. I'm still doing okay but Google Play and Apple is surpassing my income at Barnes and Noble. Their site can use an overhaul as well. It's boring and they have NO series page which makes me wonder why they make you mention if your book is part of a series if there is no series page anyway??? You have to put keywords in your title field or else your book most likely won't be found by readers. Process of Publishing on Barnes and Noble:Meh. Guess it's easy enough but it takes them a while to convert your cover and interior files and they've changed how you pick categories and made it more complicated to me but it's okay. Kobo: The worst retailer for me. I barely move anything at Kobo and my only hope selling much there is Walmart. I am at the point where I am not sure I will continue to put books on this retailer. Process of Publishing on Kobo:Extremely easy. Probably the easiest out of all the retailers but be very careful with pre-orders. If you update a pre-order file make sure you remember to re-do the date or else your book will publish THAT day. That's one thing I don't like. Kobo should have the pre-order date set and it shouldn't change whether you redo your file or not. Apple:
No Mac so I go through D2D. Apple is okay and my sales are doing better there as time goes on. Process of Publishing on Apple:
D2D makes it easy enough but I wish I could do it direct. I don't like how D2D doesn't allow you to put hyphens in your name and claim it's Apple who doesn't allow it but I see authors who are direct with Apple with hyphens in their name so it's clearly not Apple. I wish there were better categories and keywords to choose from. I don't like how they don't really have a set category for one of the genres I write but from what I hear this is a D2D issue not Apple. Other than that, easy and straightforward to upload there. Draft 2 Digital:
Best aggregator out there in my opinion. Hands down. Smashwords:
Sucks on every level and the website still looks like something out of 1998. Mark needs to get rid of that Meatgrinder. No one likes it but him! It should not be that much of a hassle to upload books on a site. I have stopped putting books on there. Not worth the time. Streetlib:Emails you every darn day and I doubt I've sold anything. I only have a few books on there for global markets. I don't plan on putting more up there. PublishDrive:Guess it's okay. I only have a few books there and use them for Global markets.
Thanks for this post, Writeway. If you don't mind, could you expound a little more about Streetlib? I'm not on Google Play yet, and I don't want to go direct, and D2D seems unable to work a deal with them. So I've been looking at Streetlib to get onto Google Play. But if there's a better aggregator for it, then I'd like to know. Any info or anecdotes you can share would be great.
|
|
|
Post by possiblyderanged on Sept 26, 2018 21:36:57 GMT
You can publish on Drive Thru Fiction. They do print and ebooks, SF but check to see just what they do. I think they mostly started up to do gaming stuff. I uploaded one book there and then never did anything else, so I can't say whether they are good for sales personally.
|
|
|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Sept 26, 2018 22:53:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Oct 2, 2018 19:02:52 GMT
I watching a Kristen Martin editing video and she mentioned that her books are available at Book Depository and Books-A-Million, so I looked them up. I didn't see an option for getting into Book Depository, but I did have better luck with BAM!So I added it to the print book options. Does anyone here sell their books at either bookstore? Books-A-Million Retail Stores Public Your Books with BAM! - www.booksamillion.com/publishers/index.html?id=7385062834643 How to Apply - www.booksamillion.com/publishers/books.html?id=7385062834643#submittitle You have to apply to the distributor that makes all of the purchasing decisions for BAM, so you fill out a form and send them a free print copy, and then they decide if they want to carry it or not. If they decide not to buy it, they donate it to charity for soldiers.
|
|
|
Post by corabuhlert on Oct 6, 2018 1:15:12 GMT
You can publish on Drive Thru Fiction. They do print and ebooks, SF but check to see just what they do. I think they mostly started up to do gaming stuff. I uploaded one book there and then never did anything else, so I can't say whether they are good for sales personally. DriveThruFiction is a good market for me. One feature I really like about them is the easy bundling option which allows you to make series bundles, themed bundles or even multi-published bundles. They also have a lot of promo options available.
|
|
|
Post by possiblyderanged on Oct 8, 2018 9:50:37 GMT
I've heard good things about Drive Thru (I think Bards and Sages/Julie uses them effectively), I just haven't taken the time to really get set up there yet. I'm still slogging through the epic SF book that never ends, plus a couple of other things on my plate, but hope to get going on other sites soon.
|
|
|
Post by dormouse on Oct 30, 2018 22:26:30 GMT
Surely it is about time for the term ‘vanity publishers’ to be retired. Not only is it another derogatory term for writers (as well as, more deservedly, some publishers), but ‘vanity publishing’ would be just as applicable to many indies.
In the old days, it was simple. There were trade publishers who, once the MSS had been vetted and found acceptable, would pay writers an ‘advance’ (and usually nothing more as the royalty rate rarely allowed the advance to be earned out); they distributed, marketed and sold the resulting books after arranging editing, design and printing. And, for those who stumbled with the filters, there were ‘vanity publishers who would take a bundle of readies in exchange for a deal of flattery and a small pile of books; a simplified enterprise avoiding the need for vetting, editing, distribution, marketing and sales. The trade publishers could sell a lot of books by incentivising and leaning on booksellers; vanity publishers could sell none because the booksellers knew who they were even if the writers didn’t/
The advent of POD, ebooks and Amazon and the rise of the Indie changed the whole landscape. Publishing is now cheap and quite easy even if selling and making money isn’t; but quite easy isn’t very easy, obvious or quick. And there are a lot of people who only want to write without messing about with publishing, and some of them make enough money in the day job to pay for people to do all the other stuff for them. Others are happy to do the messing, but they’re not good at editing, design, covers or marketing and need to buy in help.
From the websites, I can see why you list the vanity publishers above, but I’m sure that there are a lot of editors, cover designers etc who are also taking advantage of writer prey. I’m not sure it makes sense to separate out the companies who promise to do everything for large sums, from those who promise a subset for a smaller sum. Easier, maybe, to identify and name publishers rather than the individuals offering services.
FWIW, some while ago I ran the numbers on providing a whole publishing service to unsolicited MSS. Not running it as a profit centre, but trying to avoid losing money on it. Even with doing some things inhouse, I couldn’t make it work financially without normal publishing filters (and royalty rates not dramatically higher) or accepting some money up front to reduce the risks. And the latter wasn’t worth doing because of the reputational risk. I recognise the need - forums and internet advice can only help so many – but I don’t know what can be done: probably it would take one of the non-profit making writers guilds to provide basic publishing for a fee without a reputational risk. And there would be ethical issues with accepting money without operating some sort of quality filter.
|
|
|
Post by davidvandyke on Oct 31, 2018 0:47:10 GMT
Surely it is about time for the term ‘vanity publishers’ to be retired. Not only is it another derogatory term for writers (as well as, more deservedly, some publishers), but ‘vanity publishing’ would be just as applicable to many indies. In the old days, it was simple. There were trade publishers who, once the MSS had been vetted and found acceptable, would pay writers an ‘advance’ (and usually nothing more as the royalty rate rarely allowed the advance to be earned out); they distributed, marketed and sold the resulting books after arranging editing, design and printing. And, for those who stumbled with the filters, there were ‘vanity publishers who would take a bundle of readies in exchange for a deal of flattery and a small pile of books; a simplified enterprise avoiding the need for vetting, editing, distribution, marketing and sales. The trade publishers could sell a lot of books by incentivising and leaning on booksellers; vanity publishers could sell none because the booksellers knew who they were even if the writers didn’t/ The advent of POD, ebooks and Amazon and the rise of the Indie changed the whole landscape. Publishing is now cheap and quite easy even if selling and making money isn’t; but quite easy isn’t very easy, obvious or quick. And there are a lot of people who only want to write without messing about with publishing, and some of them make enough money in the day job to pay for people to do all the other stuff for them. Others are happy to do the messing, but they’re not good at editing, design, covers or marketing and need to buy in help. From the websites, I can see why you list the vanity publishers above, but I’m sure that there are a lot of editors, cover designers etc who are also taking advantage of writer prey. I’m not sure it makes sense to separate out the companies who promise to do everything for large sums, from those who promise a subset for a smaller sum. Easier, maybe, to identify and name publishers rather than the individuals offering services. FWIW, some while ago I ran the numbers on providing a whole publishing service to unsolicited MSS. Not running it as a profit centre, but trying to avoid losing money on it. Even with doing some things inhouse, I couldn’t make it work financially without normal publishing filters (and royalty rates not dramatically higher) or accepting some money up front to reduce the risks. And the latter wasn’t worth doing because of the reputational risk. I recognise the need - forums and internet advice can only help so many – but I don’t know what can be done: probably it would take one of the non-profit making writers guilds to provide basic publishing for a fee without a reputational risk. And there would be ethical issues with accepting money without operating some sort of quality filter. Scammers is as scammers does. You're arguing theory--the theory that some vanity publishers, somewhere, somehow, might not be scammers. I'll take the facts on the ground any day. The vanity publishers listed above have long histories of scamming authors out of their money. If they aren't listed, they might (caveat emptor) be worth doing business with. But if they are listed above, there is plenty of evidence they should be avoided. It doesn't make sense to say we shouldn't identify THESE known problem entities, just because we can't identify ALL scammers.
|
|
|
Post by dormouse on Oct 31, 2018 8:11:21 GMT
Scammers is as scammers does. You're arguing theory--the theory that some vanity publishers, somewhere, somehow, might not be scammers. I'll take the facts on the ground any day. The vanity publishers listed above have long histories of scamming authors out of their money. If they aren't listed, they might (caveat emptor) be worth doing business with. But if they are listed above, there is plenty of evidence they should be avoided. It doesn't make sense to say we shouldn't identify THESE known problem entities, just because we can't identify ALL scammers. That's not what I was trying to argue at all. 1. I think the term vanity publisher is outdated. The vanity bit is another way of insulting some writers. I've no problem with scammer. And I'm making no comment on the companies listed. 2. I see the need that some have for the type of service they purportedly offer. Even on an honest basis, I can't see how it can be done without upfront payment. Royalties can't cut it. I see that as a problem and it drives writers to the scammers. I also don't know of any honest company offering these services. I'd've said that anyone with a reputation would shy away from anything that looks like it, but DG seems to have identified some. AFAICS the only reasonable advice is to avoid everyone offering a total publishing package for a fee. 3. New self-publishers are guided towards a variety of types of editor, cover designers, marketers etc. Many of them won't be offering a good service either. Caveat emptor is fine, but new writers won't know what to beware of or how to judge. 4. There's also low level predation in terms of books, courses etc but feedback on those should be more available and the cost per item is usually lower. 5. Closed communities in Facebook etc make people more vulnerable. The first thing cults do with new members is to separate them from family and friends and surround them with believers.
|
|
|
Post by davidvandyke on Oct 31, 2018 17:36:40 GMT
1. I think the term vanity publisher is spot-on. The publisher tries to appeal to the writer's vanity, not their business sense, since anyone with business sense would not spend that much money for those services without a genuine track record of success.
2-5: all true, but what are you trying to say to us, IRT this thread? This thread is doing a service. What is your point?
|
|
|
Post by possiblyderanged on Nov 2, 2018 19:06:37 GMT
I think there's still a need to call things "vanity" publishing. These companies don't present themselves as providing a service, but rather as publishers. They have no quality control, unlike the traditional publisher who makes their money from sales of the book. Vanity presses make their money from charging the author for services.
A lot of places are calling themselves "hybrid" publishers now. Still the same thing. And there's often a conflict of interest when they run up on someone they won't actually publish, but are perfectly happy to sell services to.
The vanity comes in when authors who don't research traditional methods are fooled into thinking they have a publishing contract, when they truly don't. We see a lot of the same people doing self publishing, who think they simply need to upload a file at Amazon, and they have a publisher. It's hard to convince them that Amazon is simply a store front, and all the work needed to truly publish a book has fallen on them.
Maybe there could be a different term for vanity presses, but I'm not sure what would work. And after decades, would most people even get what you mean? Publish America can change their name, but they're still the same scammy "publisher" they've always been.
|
|
|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Nov 2, 2018 21:30:05 GMT
The publishing path is dark and full of terrors for all newbie no-nothings, John Snow, which is why it's so important for communities to rise up to provide illumination and knowledge on which places are honest and safe and which ones will steal your money and smear your good name. Real publishers don't charge upfront for their services. Vanities do. Real publishers actually want you to make money because they don't earn back their investment, if you don't. Vanities couldn't care less since they get everything upfront. Cover designers and editors and promo companies aren't publishers, so it's fine for them to charge upfront. Service provider is a totally different business model from publisher. They may look similar since a vanity will provide all those services for you in-house, plus publish you. But so will or should a real publisher. A non vanity one-house solution could be to have a sort of cooperative of independent cover artists and editors and publishers and social media experts/advertisers. The newbie author signs a contract with the publisher, with higher royalties than they'd get from a traditional publisher because the publisher is making you pay all your publishing expenses beforehand. But you get a good discount on all services because of the deal the service providers make with the publisher. You have total transparency, reasonable fees paid to the publisher who gets a small cut for giving the service providers the work, no outlandish promises, no actual fees to publish the book, so the publisher still has motivation to want the author to succeed. You could call this a Cooperative Publisher, maybe. I think something like that could work and would still differentiate you from the vanities who are nothing but scammers. There are probably already publishers doing this. Perhaps this is what is meant by Hybrid? If so, then we already have a name and a good differentiation between good and bad.
|
|
|
Post by dormouse on Nov 3, 2018 20:36:46 GMT
1. I think the term vanity publisher is spot-on. The publisher tries to appeal to the writer's vanity, not their business sense, since anyone with business sense would not spend that much money for those services without a genuine track record of success. Really? Someone who writes a book and thinks they need someone to publish it for them is vain and someone who thinks they can do the publishing too isn't? My big objection is that it is another example of victim blaming. A pejorative term for a set of writers who had written a book and then took the best decisions they could. You may be happy despising and insulting writers who lack 'business sense', but I'm not comfortable with it. I am, however, all in favour of informing writers of scams and scammers so they have a better chance of not getting caught. How would someone feel if they'd gone down that route and later found that they'd gone to a 'vanity press' who appealed only to their vanity and took advantage of their lack of business sense? Would they feel able to have another go? The fact that the term has been used for nearly 60 years doesn't justify its continued use; like a lot of historic terms. It was also a deliberately provocative and insulting term coined by a campaigner without any attempt at definition or apparent understanding of the multifarious publishing contracts that have existed over the years. Lewis Carroll paid Macmillan for the printing and marketing of 'Alice'. I'd be in favour of a simple list: Scams Scammers Unproven, but be careful One of the problems with most of the scams is that the proposition is intrinsically reasonable if the service is offered genuinely and with honesty. The problem is that it's something that can be abused by scammers who are interested only in the money they receive and not the service they offer. And there are a lot of them about; I thought that the reading fee scam had died out, but apparently not. PS I didn't see Austin Macauley on the list (https://jerichowriters.com/austin-macauley/) I also noticed that the article lists $1500 as a reasonable cost of self-publishing without marketing - quite a lot of money to pay for someone 'without a track record of success'; which naturally opens the doors to editing, book cover and marketing scams. I'm no more comfortable with recommendations for new self-publishers to spend that sort of money than I am with them paying a publisherL most writers aren't very good and the vast majority make very little money; my guess is that a lot of the writers on kboards actually make a loss. dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0016.104I was going to use this link to illustrate more exact terminologies etc, but it's pretty turgid so I thought I wouldn't bother. I'm adding this as a comment rather than deleting in case someone saw it and wondered what it was.
|
|
|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Nov 3, 2018 21:07:16 GMT
I have added Austin Mcauley to the list. I hadn't heard of him before. Thanks dormouse!
|
|
|
Post by dormouse on Nov 3, 2018 21:12:53 GMT
Real publishers don't charge upfront for their services. Vanities do. Real publishers actually want you to make money because they don't earn back their investment, if you don't. Vanities couldn't care less since they get everything upfront. Mostly (always?) true now, but hasn't always been the case (http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/wmt/pegasus/ch4a.html). And the advance/royalty system isn't fair to all. Advances give professional writers a regular income whatever their level of sales. That probably suits most of them; they're not targeting commercial success anyway. But publishers make all their money from a relatively small percentage of big selling books - they lose on the others. That means that big sellers receive a lot less than the value of their books because their profits are paying for most of the industry.
|
|
|
Post by dormouse on Nov 3, 2018 21:17:48 GMT
A non vanity one-house solution could be to have a sort of cooperative of independent cover artists and editors and publishers and social media experts/advertisers. The newbie author signs a contract with the publisher, with higher royalties than they'd get from a traditional publisher because the publisher is making you pay all your publishing expenses beforehand. But you get a good discount on all services because of the deal the service providers make with the publisher. You have total transparency, reasonable fees paid to the publisher who gets a small cut for giving the service providers the work, no outlandish promises, no actual fees to publish the book, so the publisher still has motivation to want the author to succeed. You could call this a Cooperative Publisher, maybe. I think something like that could work and would still differentiate you from the vanities who are nothing but scammers. There are probably already publishers doing this. Perhaps this is what is meant by Hybrid? If so, then we already have a name and a good differentiation between good and bad. I'd agree that it could work. But scammers would claim to be doing exactly that. And probably that is what most hybrid publishers are.
|
|
|
Post by dormouse on Nov 3, 2018 21:23:19 GMT
Cover designers and editors and promo companies aren't publishers, so it's fine for them to charge upfront. Service provider is a totally different business model from publisher. The concept is right, but the practice may not be. One of the problems with the kboards regime is that it gives a sales and promotion channel for these people but severely limits the possibilities for criticism of the services provided.
|
|
|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Nov 3, 2018 23:27:13 GMT
dormouse, You should always be able to criticize any product or service you pay for, and you should be able to get your money back if they didn't fulfill their end of the bargain. So our reputable cooperative would have a vibrant feedback system and would offer a money-back guarantee. The guarantee would come out of the publisher's pocket which would also serve as another motivator to make sure they only do business with honest and capable providers. Yes, traditional publishing is definitely not perfect. It has a ton of drawbacks, especially now, which is why we're mostly indies here. And I'm sure lots of unethical shenanigans have gone on in the past and are probably still going on now. Whenever you go into business with another person there is always a risk of being scammed or swindled. One more reason for the community to keep speaking up when we hear about bad actors whether they be traditional publishers, hybrid/vanities, or indie service providers.
|
|
|
Post by dormouse on Oct 20, 2019 20:24:54 GMT
I was looking at a Bookbub book and saw that it was published by Bookouture. For some reason (procrastination) I decided to check out their terms. They're digital only with POD. Set up by someone with Harlequin experience and since bought by Hachette.
They promise to read all submissions. They pay for all publishing costs including two tiers of editing (but also recommend that writers have their MSS professionally edited before submission!). Predominantly Crime and Women's fiction (most sub-genres), but open to anything and some of their authors are fantasy & dystopia. No advance but will pay writers 45% of the net for ebooks etc.
I think they must be really hot on selection, costs and marketing to make a profit on those terms. They do have some very big sellers, so maybe that's where their margin comes from. I do wonder about staff salary and commission levels.
|
|
|
Post by dormouse on Nov 7, 2019 15:12:51 GMT
So, Izzard Ink? But the writers can choose which of their services to buy, they say the price can be lower (presumably for lower quality or quantity) and they are rated Excellent - Partner on the ALLi list. Reading Bookbub, I noticed a book there at a reduced price of $3.85. Unusual I thought. Book seems quite extensively reviewed. Some reviews suggest that the editing could be better. Cover's not awful, but not spectacularly good either (maybe he didn't go for the $2,000 cover option!).
|
|
|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Nov 7, 2019 18:18:01 GMT
Thanks! I added them to the vanity section. I feel bad for all of the newbies out there who come across predatory companies like this one. Self-Publishing can feel overwhelming when you're just starting out and it can be easy to get sucked into this kind of scheme. It's not that these companies don't do anything for their writers. It's just that anyone can set up shop and call themselves a publishing expert, and since they know more than the newbie, the newbie blindly opens up their wallet.
The book you linked to is actually doing pretty good, it has a passable cover and lots of reviews. And he may have spent the same amount of money on his own. I don't know. But could he have done better on his own? We'll never know.
They offer a free guide but force you to give your phone number to get it, which means they will call and hard sell you their services. I run away screaming from anything like that. Overwhelmed newbies are easy targets. Even if the services they provide are adequate and somewhat helpful. I just don't like the predatory business practice of charging hugely inflated prices to unsuspecting publishing virgins.
|
|
|
Post by dormouse on Nov 7, 2019 20:50:15 GMT
I added them to the vanity section. I'll not argue with that - though I still hate the term. I think that they probably do offer the services they claim. But the structure of the site looks vanity, pulling in the ignorant. They say they don't just accept anyone, but nothing to suggest that anyone is rejected either. Prices are high. Not necessarily unjustifiable, but I couldn't see anything indicating real expertise. Makes me question the ALLi ratings and the methodology behind them. There has clearly been a bit of marketing (or something) behind this particular book. Sales rank not very high but they have chosen a higher price strategy for a book that (probably? possibly?) doesn't have mass market appeal. That's what I would have done myself. Looks as if there will be a ready market for any sequels. Had a quick peep at the Look Inside: a bit over written and clunky. But not an easy thing for an editor to improve without rewriting completely. Might settle down as the book gets going. If I'd been the publisher, I would have suggested that the author go away, reread all of Chesterton's Father Brown books (I'm sure he must have read them at some point) and then rewrite his own; written over 100 years ago, not dissimilar in style in some ways, but much more elegance and movement.
|
|
|
Post by K'Sennia Visitor on Nov 7, 2019 21:34:19 GMT
They most likely paid for the high Alli ranking. For $199 you get placed in their directory.
Vanity isn't really the right word. These are businesses selling shovels to gold miners. But I'm not sure what other name to give them. Publishing Peddlers? When you're paying someone to upload your book to amazon for them, the uploader isn't going to tell you you're shit or not ready for publication. They'll polish you as much as they have ability, then let you loose. That's the difference between a real publisher and a peddler. If the services provider makes money whether you sell a single copy or not you know they are not invested in anything other than you paying your fee. So you've got to be proactive and aware and don't trust any of the peddlers choices without doing your own research first.
Of course if the author was up to doing their own research they wouldn't be using a peddler in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by dormouse on Nov 7, 2019 21:59:45 GMT
Vanity isn't really the right word. These are businesses selling shovels to gold miners. But I'm not sure what other name to give them. Publishing Peddlers? Of course if the author was up to doing their own research they wouldn't be using a peddler in the first place. I don't know. I think it is potentially a perfectly respectable business niche. Lots of writers don't want, or may not have the time, to take on the publishing side effectively, but they can afford to have someone else do it. They may not have the time to chase agents and publishing deals either. So then it comes down to value - price/quality. But it's all black box. From outside, you can't see how much they do or how well they do it. Here they seem to be good at self-promotion, but evidence of the nuts and bolts expertise in publishing itself is lacking from outside. The website has a typical vanity look. The prices are at that level. They claim that they are not vanity. No shortage of red flags, once you know what a red flag looks like.
|
|